Skip to main content.
November 29th, 2006

What is wrong with the Republicans?

gop_poop_flag.jpgIt’s becoming clearer and clearer everyday that Republicans in the state of Delaware are becoming less and less a powerful influence than they once were. A clear sign of their cowering can be made by the fact that they feel threatened by maverick individuals within their own party who are seeking the respect and attention they deserve. I can name about half-a-dozen of these individuals off the top of my head, but for the sake of brevity, this post will be have a clearer, targeted message.

The Republicans had hoped to gain seats in the Senate and maintain their comfortable majority in the House. They gained nothing in the Senate and are rapidly losing seats in the House. Let’s hope no Republican Representatives retire in two years because The Blue Wave could easily take the three seats currently keeping the GOP in the majority.

So the Republicans have a problem. I believe some of the blame can be attributed to the fact that “Republican” is almost a nasty word these days; so fouled up by a belligerantly hostile Republican Commander-in-Chief that many Republicans are finding it hard to even support the man. Unfortunately, this means the good fortune for many local Republican politicians has been soured by the general attitude that citizens nationwide are feeling about the party.

However, an even greater argument can be made that certain individuals within the leadership of the Republican Party — be they politicians or rank-and-file party-folk — have been unwilling to bend with the times; that is, accept that their party must abandon some of the ways of the old and look to the future to guide policy and implement new ideas. Several totally unthrilling (and hand-selected) candidates were offered to Delawareans this year by the Republicans. The Republicans and Democrats both laid out their hands early on this year in backroom-deals that saw them endorsing candidates well before the primary. To the Democrats it didn’t really matter because they were expected to reap the rewards big. The Republican leadership, however, seemed to be operating on the cavalier attitude that they knew better than the thousands of registered memebers of their party. And that arrogance certainly didn’t gain them any points in an election season that was already weighted well enough against them.

conscience-of-the-gop1-small.jpgAnd that arrogance has been called out in a stunningly damning anonymous letter from a Republican who wants his or her party to return to some common sense. Ron Williams discussed some of the contents of this letter in his column yesterday, though some of us in the Delaware blogosphere have known about it and its contents for a while now. Click on the image at the left to open up a pdf of the letter. In short, many in the party’s leadership have been thoroughly eviscerated in what can only be described as a militant missive meant to convey some strong feelings to people who should know better and who need to hear this message.

The letter writer is brutally honest, using words such as “conniving,” “deceitful,” and “ineffective.” And those are just the words used to describe Republican National Committeewoman Priscilla Rakestraw! Here is some of his/her pointed commentary:

Terry Strine: A failure at almost every level except fundraising.

Mike Castle: He is the real party chairman who has had a 20 year alliance with Tom Carper. Maybe his stroke will wake us up to get a replacement for him in 2008.

Jan Ting: Elitist and out of touch.

Charlie Copeland: Glib, insincere and cocky.

Wayne Smith: The man who wanted “bastard” to stay in state laws. See Delaware 2006 for the truth.

John Still: His own caucus barely trusts him.

Christine O’Donnell: Self-absorbed, delusional, and single issue.

In the end, the letter writer claims the Republican Party has done wrong by casting Mike Protack as the delusional fop in the party. The letter writer believes Protack is one of a few who’s actually offered fresh ideas on how the Republican Party can more fervently attract newcomers and retain their near-disenfranchised base that has been held hostage by Party leadership.

The writer ends with this sobering plea:

I have lived in New Castle County and I now live in Sussex County. I have won and lost elections and I have been a delegate for years. Please read and understand what I say and don’t spend a lot of time figuring out who I am. Our party is on life support, and we can’t wait much longer.

Sounds like someone needs to put this person in charge of something.

Republicans, have your say here!

Posted by Mike Matthews in First State Filth

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 29th, 2006 at 4:17 pm and is filed under First State Filth. You can follow any responses to this entry through the comments RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Possibly Related

48 Responses to “What is wrong with the Republicans?”

  1. MOT Newbie says:

    Because we are a danger to their robot programming….
    Intruder Alert
    Intruder Alert
    Someone has a mind of his/her own
    Must assimilate or eliminate

  2. Jimmy Hatt says:

    National Republicans: They are arrogant and self centered.
    Local Republicans : Robots that are programed with incompetence. They are controlled by serial sexist that only want African Americans and women for a photo oppertunity and their vote. A party controlled by developers.

    Delaware Republicans have not learned there arn’t enough votes from the gated communities to elect their candidates. Being pro big business, heavy on pollution, build anywhere and on anything with a 3rd class education turns voters against you. The campaign for attorney general was the go off the cliff race that has defined the Delaware GOP for the next 10 years.
    With Rakestraw & Strine at the helm, they will lose the house in 2008.

  3. Disbelief says:

    The good part is that, like an alcoholic who has reached rock bottom, the Delaware GOP knows now that its Politics Anonymous or death. I’m hoping this bottom-of-the-barrel reality will allow the Nixons and Protacks to introduce a focus on working for our State’s citizens. (although Mike, you really do need to lay off the social engineering; people’s lifestyle choices really aren’t the business of government unless minors and lack of consent is the issue; we don’t want government in our bedrooms except to keep the electric cost of the bedstand table light reasonable).

  4. Iconoclast says:

    The GOP realizes it has a ’substance abuse’ problem (the abuse being a lack of substance)? It appears to be a bit more than “rock bottom”. At this point the crack addicts giving head for a $5 rock are disdainful of the party leadership.

  5. anon says:

    This letter is just a mashup of points made on Delaware blogs for the last year. It’s only news to people who don’t read blogs.

  6. jason says:

    At this point the crack addicts giving head for a $5 rock are disdainful of the party leadership.

    OMG. I’m not worthy.

  7. steamboat willy says:

    Mavericks = can’t Lead or Follow

    Half a dozen? name them please.

    I see someone slipped you a copy of that Mike Protac letter… I mean the “annonymous” Everyone is bad letter.

    baseless name calling is now “brutally honest”?

  8. steamboat willy says:

    “They are controlled by serial sexist that only want African Americans and women for a photo oppertunity and their vote”

    OK, I’ll bite, what is a serial sexist? and who are they?

  9. Disbelief says:

    Steamboat Willy writes: “… what is a serial sexist? and who are they?”

    Can we do a poll on this blog? Put in names of the GOP leadership, and see who gets to be the serial sexist.

    I’ll go first. My guess is Prince “Lil’ Johnny”. But its not fair to limit him to just sexist. It would appear he hates just about everyone.

  10. Nancy Willing says:

    I have this same picture in my files but with Bush’s face on the little yellow flag….
    :)

    The Republicans and Democrats both laid out their hands early on this year in backroom-deals that saw them endorsing candidates well before the primary

    Mike it is not just this year … this effort to undermine an actually democratic electoral process by these maneuverings goes back quite a long ways….we need to do some research on this .

  11. FSP says:

    One funny thing about the letter is that they blast the GOP for unilaterally picking bad candidates, but then say that the GOP owes Protack a shot at a statewide office. If Republicans ‘cleared the way’ for him to have an open shot at statewide office, wouldn’t the GOP be doing the exact evil thing they’re accusing the GOP of doing now?

  12. Tyler Nixon says:

    I have gotten several inquiries about whether I wrote this atomic letter : “Survival of the GOP” or whatever.

    To put it in writing here : the answer is absolutely no I did not write it, know about it, know who wrote it, nor have anything to do with it whatsoever. I have been lately playing the same guessing game as anyone else.

    My condemnations of Delaware GOP leadership failures have been quite public, as most people paying attention know by now. I certainly don’t need to do so anonymously.

    As far as this letter, I must confess to having disdain generally for the inside / gossipy / grapevine way of doing politics, especially in the GOP. 5 years ago when I was battlng for reform in the Wilmington GOP I received a very cryptic anonymous letter of support. How bizarre, I thought, that anyone should feel so intimidated within our own party to go to such lengths to avoid even be marginally identified as supporting change.

    I routinely avoid communicating with “insiders” about anything but items of relative moment that could be aired just the same publicly. Recent years of Delaware GOP inside communications (at least to which I am privy) have been so lacking in consequence or depth that my communications with titular party insiders (like Steamboat Willy) have become near non-existent.

    Without a doubt this has made me a happier political activist and one much less clouded by useless nonsense that wastes time and energy on process, political games, and personalities. It has been a really nice way to keep focused on policy, public service, and reality.

    But hey, that’s just me.

    Regards,

    Tyler

  13. steamboat willy says:

    “titular party insiders (like Steamboat Willy)”

    Hey, watch it with the dirty talk…

    and for your information, they are pecs, not man-boobs.

  14. Hube says:

    Mike: Wayne Smith already addressed that “bastard” nonsense in a DE 2006 blog post.

    Looks like you’re, among others, still recycling lies. Yeah — let’s put an anonymous person who forwards old lies in charge! That’ll make everything so much better!!

    Why not bring up a worthy criticism of Smith or something, huh?

  15. Mike Matthews says:

    Hube,

    Why can’t Rep. Smith come on here and defend himself? I know the two of you are chummy and all, which is cool, but you acting as his surrogate all the time is a bit odd.

  16. FSP says:

    I can pretty much guarantee Tyler didn’t write that letter.

  17. Lefty says:

    “Let’s hope no Republican Representatives retire in two years because The Blue Wave could easily take the three seats currently keeping the GOP in the majority.”

    Good to know you’re rooting against us.

  18. Lefty says:

    …and for Wayne Smith being Majority Leader.

  19. G Rex says:

    They took the word “bastard” out of the state law? In favor of what, “sonsabitches?”

    And no mention of Ernie Lopez?

    I’m just surprised Mike made it past “Christine O’Donnell: Self-absorbed, delusional, and single.”

  20. G Rex says:

    …issue.

  21. Tyler Nixon says:

    Willy! Great to see you have a sense of humor. I wanted to find out if you were paying attention, by blowing some smoke your way…thanks for not getting all angry.

    FSP (Dave B.)! That is quite a titillating (not titular) hint you dropped. Will FSP blog have any bombshells for us in the near future concerning the “GOP Conscience”, Mr. Inside Outsider Burris (or is it Outside Insider?)? Thanks for giving witness of sorts to my not writing such a harsh missive. I just feel lucky I was spared from its acid-tongued commentary. Either way, I bet my own public comments have had me on the s*** list well ahead of whoever wrote it.

    Cheers.

  22. Mike Matthews says:

    Lefty,

    I was writing that from the perspective of a bewildered Republican. I could care less if the Republicans lose their seats. That being said, I’m also not a fan of Wayne Smith’s politics, so you can shoot that theory out of the water, also.

  23. Hube says:

    Why can’t Rep. Smith come on here and defend himself? I know the two of you are chummy and all, which is cool, but you acting as his surrogate all the time is a bit odd.

    Hey Mike — if you are as “with it” as you’d like people to believe regarding local politics, the link I provided contains Smith’s own words regarding the lies you’ve repeated here. IOW, he’s already defended himself on local blogs — not only on DE 2006 but on Dana’s site, too. What — does he have to come here, too, and do it all over again? Is your blog really that “special” that the Majority Leader has to make a personal visit? That’s what is odd, Mike, not my pointing out your silly redundancies.

    Did you somehow miss the fact that [local] blogs played a pitifully small role in local election results a few weeks ago?

  24. FSP says:

    Tyler — No, I do not know for sure who wrote it, but I would bet it’s not from anyone down here. I just know you well enough to know it wasn’t you.

  25. Hube says:

    And, just in case, my last sentence isn’t meant as a criticism, Mike. You’ve probably read my praises of your (and Dana’s and Dave’s) blog work pre-election in many comments here and elsewhere. But the fact remains that your combined influence was miniscule. It’s a shame, but that’s what is.

  26. steamboat willy says:

    no one who has been paying attention could possible have thought Tyler wrote that letter.

    While he has expressed similar sentiments, he has done it with bigger words, more complex sentence structure and and a loftier tone.

  27. steamboat willy says:

    FSP,

    yeah, the wilmington postmark kind of lets sussex of the hook.

  28. Mike Matthews says:

    Hube,

    The fact that I’ve reprinted something that has already been distributed means nothing to me. Yes, I read your report at the DCBA blog, however, it rather slipped my mind when I wrote this. Simple as that. Here’s the thing: I’ve received about half-a-dozen “parcels” of information regarding Rep. Smith. Apparently, he’s not a very well-liked guy in the House of Representatives, among political junkies and his colleagues alike. I’ve actually REFUSED to print most of the stuff because — as has been pointed out by you and others — it just seems ridiculously preposterous. And I’m talking about more than the DE Clean Sweep business.

    However, if only a tenth of the things I’ve received are true — which I wouldn’t doubt — then it means Rep. Smith is hardly the admirable person you make him out to be. Simple as that. I’ve used a heck of a lot more discretion when it comes to your friend Rep. Smith. So stop busting my balls for my reprinting something that is totally small potatoes in regards to the bigger picture laid out in this post. If it makes you (or poor Rep. Smith) feel any better, I’ve struck out the text and replaced it with a link to Delaware 2006.

  29. FSP says:

    Well, SW, a lot of our mail gets routed through Wilmington. There are other things that tip me off as to who did it.

  30. G Rex says:

    “…the wilmington postmark kind of lets sussex of the hook.”

    That and the fact that Mr. X has “won and lost elections” leaves out Nixon and Protack, who’ve only lost elections…as yet.

  31. FSP says:

    I think that’s designed to throw people off. I can only think of a handful of people who retired to Sussex who held elective office upstate, guys like Dave Ennis and Dick Cecil, and they don’t fit the bill at all.

  32. Bob says:

    Hey guys………….Ernie Lopez is in Sussex now. I know he and his brain trust were pretty upset with Cannery Row regarding radio spots they put up in the final weeks of his race in 04 for NCC Council President.

    He was pulling close to the FreeberryCapano candidate Paul Clark until the great communicators at Headquarters put out radio ads attacking Clark’s wife ala Beau don’t Know. It went downhill from there no matter how much Lopez worked his butt off which, from what people say……..he did.

    He’s my guess. Haven’t heard much better………

  33. Nancy Willing says:

    Why has no one pointed the culpret-sniffing dogs to the now-fired staffers?
    Just a thought.

  34. MOT Newbie says:

    On that Wilmington postmark…think bulk mail or reduced-rate mail, which that likely was. This John AssDoe, I mean Ass Doe, I mean John Doe (or Jane) likely hired a service to do the “drop” and most of those in DE go through the Quigly Rd Post Office-hub in New Castle. The postmark there for that kind of drop is Wilmington, despite the exact address. I’m not saying that is what happened, but what might have happened. There is also the possibility that mystery-person works north, lives south. Then there is also the possibility that this person is just so full of crap, the Sussex claim had as much accuracy as the signature of that letter.

  35. MOT Newbie says:

    Nancy, from what I was told, only one of those staffers had a chip on hisher shoulder and the others expected it for a while. That person who was miffed? It would shock me to hear if heshe was the culprit, it truly would.

  36. Nancy Willing says:

    Yeah, it is a thought but not likely the culpret.
    It has been very interesting radio of late, though for all of the likely suspects to be trotted out and then they called in one by one to refute the rumor.
    Tyler Nixon, Mike Protack and Tommy Little were the ones I heard expounding on it.

    I assume that Gerry Fulcher passed the letter on to Mike Matthews here for our viewing pleasure. Thanks Mike!!

  37. Tyler Nixon says:

    While he has expressed similar sentiments, he has done it with bigger words, more complex sentence structure and and a loftier tone.

    Awww thanks, Willy. My mom were an English teacher.

  38. Tyler Nixon says:

    Nancy,

    I heard some scuttlebut that I was suspected of writing the letter and I have learned enough to know rumors or speculation like this are best put to bed quickly.

    The letter was a definite shock even to me, simply considering its audience and its content.

    Beyond that, I wouldn’t waste a dime of my money to send out a letter like that to an audience that might be shocked but still not the slightest bit moved by it.

    TPN

  39. Mike Protack says:

    I did not get this letter in the mail. Unfortunately, I was out of town a lot in the middle of the month. In order to be around the first week (election) and also have Thanksgiving off I had to fly a lot in the middle of the month plus I had four days of annual simulator FAA recertification thrown in there.

    I was on WDEL twice this week and I dont know where this letter came from or whom but as much as that interests some I am more interested in what it had to say. I was particularly taken by the comments on John Still. I had no idea his leadership post was at risk. There is a lot of frustration in the letter and I don’t support much of what is said and hiding in the shadows is my stlye either. It is clearly an insider who has had his/her fill.

    Still, for the grassy knoll crowd I guess it is exciting. I am much more concerned about the future of the party and if it is apparent that we will be changing key members of the leadership let’s do it now and not wait till the convention next year.

    The person who wrote this did not help me and I prefer settling differences with a fistfight in the open than stabbing in a dark alley.

    Have a great day,

    Mike Protack

  40. Bob says:

    I take back my idea that it was Lopez.

    After reading the letter again, I can’t imagine the guy even thinking, much less saying some of the things that were in there. He’s too nice. I feel bad that I even brought his name up regarding this issue.

    Hate to see Dick and Dave’s name get thrown around in this as well. Its not their MO either.

  41. FSP says:

    “Hate to see Dick and Dave’s name get thrown around in this as well. Its not their MO either.”

    That was my point. Their only qualifications were that they were once elected upstate and now live downstate. I didn’t mean to insinuate that they wrote it. That’s why I said they didn’t fit the bill.

  42. joe smith says:

    Sounds like Dick Cecil or Dave Ennis wrote this

  43. MOT Newbie says:

    Sounds like someone is full of snark!!!

  44. steamboat willy says:

    you are asuming that “I have won and lost election” means that the writer was a candidate.

    That phrase could mean the writer was a campaign manager or key advisor.

    In the end, it doesnt matter who wrote it. The writer is a nobody. He doesn’t offer leadership or even labor to build the party. He is just a crank who spent a couple of hundred dollars to throw mud at everyone who works to build the party.

  45. Disbelief says:

    Dick Cecil and Dave Ennis? There’s a blast from the past.

  46. Mike Protack says:

    Steamboat, I agree I think it was a campaign person not a candidate and also, who cares? The one correct thing is the GOP is on life support.

    I surmise that maybe his/her labor in the past was not appreciated very much and now is a convenient time to throw a punch. Still, he/she does seem to have some inside scoop that most of us do not have.

    Mike Protack

  47. Councilman Pasquale Elsmere says:

    I hope the Delaware Republicans keep Republican National Committeewoman Priscilla Rakestraw on. With her helping Republicans candidates, we Democrats are sure to take the House in 2008.

  48. Mike Matthews says:

    Do I detect some sarcasm, Councilman Pasquale? I think you may have a point!

Leave a Reply

You can use the following XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Subscribe without commenting